Bloomberg reported on September 11, 2026 that Apollo Global Management is in talks to acquire Johnson & Johnson's DePuy Synthes orthopedics unit at a ~$20 billion equity value, with enterprise value approaching $28 billion once debt is layered in. The deal—if it closes—ends an 11-month process that began when JNJ announced on October 14, 2025 it would separate the orthopedics business within 18 to 24 months, originally framing the move as a tax-free spinoff. The price tells the real story: DePuy Synthes generated approximately $9.3 billion in FY2025 revenue (~10% of JNJ total, ~30% of MedTech), implying an equity-to-sales multiple of about 2.15x, or 3.0x on an enterprise basis including debt. By contrast, Stryker trades at roughly 5.8x EV/sales on its FY2025 figures and even after the 2026 stock pullback sits at ~4.5x on trailing twelve months.
Multiple gap
The Multiple Is the Message
Stryker's premium is structural, not sentimental. The company exited FY2025 with $25.1 billion in total revenue (up 11.2%), $9.5 billion of which came from the Orthopaedics segment (up 4.3%), and accelerated to 9.1% segment growth in Q2 2026 driven by Mako installations. With an enterprise value of $117.2 billion against $25.8 billion in trailing revenue, Stryker commands 4.54x EV/sales today and 5.84x on FY2025. Zimmer Biomet, Smith & Nephew, Globus Medical and the DePuy bid all cluster between 2.27x and 3.06x—evidence that public markets have stopped paying for orthopedic scale alone.
| Company | Ticker | Revenue (TTM) | Enterprise Value | EV / Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stryker (FY2025 multiple) | SYK | $25.12B | $146.7B | 5.84x |
| Stryker (current) | SYK | $25.84B | $117.2B | 4.54x |
| DePuy Synthes (Apollo bid) | — (private) | $9.30B | ~$28.0B | 3.01x |
| Zimmer Biomet (FY2025) | ZBH | $8.23B | $25.2B | 3.06x |
| Globus Medical (TTM) | GMED | $3.14B | $9.6B | 3.06x |
| Smith & Nephew (TTM) | SNN | $6.30B | $14.5B | 2.27x |
| Integer Holdings (FY2025) | ITGR | $1.85B | $5.6B | 3.05x |
Robotics moat
Mako Is the Reason Stryker Earns Its Premium
Stryker exited 2025 with more than 3,000 Mako robotic systems installed worldwide, up from over 2,000 at year-end 2024. Mako now powers more than 50% of global knee implant procedures and over 20% of global hip implant procedures; in the U.S., more than two-thirds of Stryker knee surgeries are Mako-assisted. The company is launching Mako RPS—a handheld robotic version aimed at ambulatory surgery centers—mid-2026, locking in the lowest-cost site of care where competitors are weakest.
- Zimmer Biomet has installed 1,000+ ROSA Knee and Hip systems since 2019—roughly a third of Stryker's Mako footprint.
- DePuy Synthes has performed 100,000+ VELYS Robotic-Assisted procedures across 31 global markets, but system-level penetration lags both Stryker and Zimmer Biomet; VELYS Hip Navigation launched only in mid-2026.
- Smith & Nephew's CORI platform is the smallest of the four and has not closed the procedural gap to VELYS, let alone Mako.
- Robotic-assisted knee procedures now represent the majority of total global knee implant volume—the segment where Stryker enjoys its widest installed-base advantage.
- The capital intensity of expanding Mako drives amortization and R&D expense that compress near-term margins, but locks out competitors via surgeon-training and ASC contract lock-in.
The orthopedic market is roughly $50 billion for implants and instruments, with joint replacement alone at ~$24 billion in 2025 and projected to expand to ~$30 billion by 2030. Inside that, knee share is split Zimmer Biomet 33%, Stryker 30%, DePuy 16%, Smith & Nephew 11%; hip share runs Stryker 26%, Zimmer Biomet 25%, DePuy 20%, Smith & Nephew 8%. Stryker's hip leadership is the segment robots do not yet dominate—suggesting Mako RPS and hip software can extend the moat into the area where DePuy is still strongest.
Competitive reset
Two-Tier Industry: One Premium Player, Four Tier-Two OEMs
Apollo's $20B bid does something worse than punish Johnson & Johnson shareholders for 14 years of DePuy underperformance: it forces the rest of the orthopedic value chain to re-rate around a permanent two-tier structure. Stryker sits in tier one, with the installed base, the robotic system, and the multiple to fund both. The other four—including Stryker's traditional peers—now trade at or near the level Apollo is willing to pay for DePuy, which is roughly the price of an LBO underwritten on 3.0x EV/sales and a heavy debt stack.
- Zimmer Biomet is the most exposed: revenue ($8.23B FY2025) is barely below DePuy's, but trading multiple (3.06x) is essentially identical to the Apollo bid—meaning investors are already pricing ZBH as if a private-equity buyer could step in at any moment.
- Smith & Nephew lowered full-year guidance on a 'soft' first-half 2026 and trades at the lowest orthopedic multiple (2.27x); its January 2026 acquisition of Integrity Orthopaedics for $450M is a defensive bolt-on, not a category-defining move.
- Globus Medical has the cleanest balance sheet (net cash) and the highest EBITDA margin among the small-cap peers (~28%), but lost share post-NuVasive merger and trades at 3.06x on $3.14B of revenue.
- Apollo's strategy appears classic LBO: lift margins via cost cuts (SG&A at DePuy is bloated inside JNJ MedTech), exit non-core trauma, and hold for a robotic-asset reacceleration or strategic sale in 5–7 years.
Upstream
The Supply Chain Picks a Side
Upstream, the carve-out is bullish for contract manufacturers and bearish for raw-material suppliers chasing large-OEM share. Integer Holdings—the largest pure-play medical device contract manufacturer at $1.85B FY2025 revenue—sells hip and knee reamers, chisels and other surgical instruments into the orthopedic channel and has EV/sales of 3.05x, in line with the DePuy multiple. The bigger inflection is the May 14, 2026 closing of the Tecomet + Orchid Orthopedic Solutions merger, which combined two PE-backed contract manufacturers (Charlesbank Capital and Nordic Capital) into a 24-facility global platform estimated near $1 billion in revenue. With DePuy now capital-constrained under LBO leverage, and Smith & Nephew retrenching, the consolidated Tecomet is positioned to absorb outsourced instrument, implant-finishing and additive-manufacturing work that tier-two OEMs increasingly cannot justify doing in-house.
- Integer Holdings FY2025 revenue $1.85B; Q1 2026 sales $440M with 1.3% organic growth; orthopedic instruments sit inside the Medical segment that competes with the combined Tecomet.
- Tecomet + Orchid merger closed May 14, 2026; combined footprint covers titanium machining, cobalt-chromium forging and polymer implant components—the full DePuy bill of materials.
- Apollo's $1.25B for 13% of McKesson Medical-Surgical Solutions (April 2026, valuing MMS at ~$13B) demonstrates Apollo's comfort deploying capital into low-growth, high-cash-flow medical distribution and supply-chain assets—a clear read-through for tier-two OEM strategies.
- Raw-material suppliers (titanium, cobalt-chrome, medical-grade polymers) face margin pressure as DePuy's new owner pushes COGS reduction; the orthopedic contract-manufacturing market itself is projected to grow from $13.3B in 2026 to $33.2B by 2033 (13.9% CAGR).
Downstream
Hospitals and ASCs Face a Robotics Tipping Point
Downstream, the consequences hit the customer. ~7 million patients annually flow through DePuy Synthes channels; under Apollo ownership, the unit will likely accelerate product rationalization, cut trauma and extremities SKUs, and price-discount more aggressively in markets where it has lost share. Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers—the fastest-growing site of care for orthopedic procedures—will get a tier-two OEM that behaves more like a competitor on price and less like the research arm of Johnson & Johnson. For ASCs, Stryker's mid-2026 Mako RPS launch is the counterweight: a handheld robotic system designed for outpatient settings, lowering the capital cost of going robotic and effectively locking ASCs into Stryker implants and consumables.
- U.S. joint replacement volumes are projected to keep mid-single-digit growth through 2030 as ASCs take share from hospital inpatient settings.
- Robotic-assisted knee penetration above 50% globally means the next install cycle will be a share-take between Mako RPS, ROSA upgrades, and VELYS Spine/Hip expansions—not a new market-creation event.
- Smith & Nephew's CORI refresh will likely come in 2027; if it slips, SNN's 8% hip share and 11% knee share become acquisition currency.
- Hospital procurement groups negotiating 2027 contracts face a Stryker supplier with >2/3 U.S. knee Mako penetration and three sub-scale tier-two OEMs all trying to compete on price.
Horizons
What Moves First—and What Doesn't
Short-term (days to quarters): the read-through to Zimmer Biomet is the most acute. With public orthopedic comps now anchored at 3.0x EV/sales and DePuy likely to be delisted through 2027, ZBH trades at parity with a leveraged LBO target and offers no premium for its 33% U.S. knee share. Smith & Nephew's Q2 2026 guidance cut and the lowered full-year outlook on 'soft' first-half sales reinforce that tier-two is getting bid down before any actual consolidation happens. Integer Holdings and Apollo's stock should re-rate on each incremental disclosure of outsourcing commitments from DePuy or SNN.
Long-term (1–3 years): the structural question is whether the tier-two cluster—DePuy private, ZBH public, SNN public, GMED public—consolidates around two surviving scaled players or remains a fragmented, cost-cut value trap. Apollo's playbook historically points to a 5–7 year hold with operational improvement and eventual strategic exit; the bull case for Stryker is that even one less competitive tier-two OEM (via DePuy/SNN/ZBH M&A) extends Mako's pricing power through 2030. The bear case is that PE-owned DePuy emerges leaner in 2028 with $5B+ of fresh Mako-like robotic capability funded by recapitalization—turning the two-tier structure into a knife fight inside tier two while Stryker's premium narrows.
Synthesis
What It Means, For Whom, Over What Horizon
The right way to read Apollo's bid is not as a JNJ exit story but as a market-structure event. Stryker's premium stopped being about scale and started being about the robotic surgery installed base—a flywheel that 3,000+ Mako systems, 50%+ global knee procedural penetration and the upcoming ASC-focused Mako RPS launch reinforce every quarter. Zimmer Biomet, Smith & Nephew and Globus Medical now trade at multiples that are essentially interchangeable with what Apollo will pay for DePuy, and that compression is unlikely to widen until the tier-two cluster consolidates. The contract manufacturers—Integer Holdings, the merged Tecomet/Orchid platform, and the additive-manufacturing specialists—are the structural winners as capital-constrained OEMs push more work outside their own four walls.
Investable read-throughs
- Orthopaedics segment +9.1% YoY in Q2 2026 (vs +4.3% full-year FY2025), with >3,000 Mako systems installed—the moat widens for at least four more quarters.
- Trades at 5.84x FY2025 EV/sales vs DePuy bid at 3.0x; the multiple gap should hold or expand as Apollo-owned DePuy becomes a price-disciplined LBO target.
- Mako RPS launch mid-2026 targets ambulatory surgery centers, the fastest-growing site of care—locks in 2027–2028 implant and consumables revenue.
- FY2025 revenue $8.23B and 33% U.S. knee share give it scale, but the 3.06x EV/sales multiple matches the DePuy bid—any tier-two consolidation would lift the multiple; absent that, ZBH is the most likely Apollo follow-on target.
- ROSA at 1,000+ installed systems is a real platform but trails Mako 3:1—price competition with DePuy and Stryker on robotic installs will pressure ROSA attach rates.
- Net debt/EBITDA of 3.6x leaves limited balance-sheet capacity for a defensive acquisition—limits ZBH's ability to consolidate the tier-two cluster from a position of strength.
- Trades at 2.27x TTM EV/sales—the lowest orthopedic multiple—after Q2 2026 guidance was cut on 'soft' first-half sales of $3.097B.
- 8% hip share and 11% knee share, combined with CORI being the smallest of the four robotic platforms—puts SNN in the Apollo-follow-on crosshairs within 24 months.
- January 2026 $450M Integrity Orthopaedics acquisition is a defensive bolt-on, not a category reset—execution risk remains through 2027.
- 3.06x EV/sales on $3.14B TTM revenue matches DePuy/ZBH—scale is the limiting factor in a tier-two market where size increasingly requires a balance sheet.
- Cleanest balance sheet in the orthopedic small-cap space (net cash), 27.9% EBITDA margin—a defensive asset if a tier-two consolidation wave begins.
- Post-NuVasive merger share losses in spine suggest integration execution is the swing variable—2027 is when the market will reassess GMED as a tier-two consolidator.
- FY2025 revenue $1.85B, 3.05x EV/sales; orthopedic surgical instruments (hip/knee reamers, chisels) sit in the Medical segment—the read-through winner as tier-two OEMs outsource more.
- Q1 2026 organic growth of 1.3% should accelerate through 2027 as Apollo-owned DePuy and Smith & Nephew push cost-out programs—outsourcing penetration rises when OEMs cut capex.
- Combined with the merged Tecomet/Orchid platform ($1B+ revenue, 24 facilities), ITGR is positioned to take incremental DePuy contract manufacturing over the next 24 months.
- $938B AUM and a $1.25B investment for 13% of McKesson Medical-Surgical Solutions (April 2026, valuing MMS at $13B) demonstrate comfort deploying $20B+ into medical assets.
- DePuy's ~$9.3B revenue and stable cash flow profile fit the Apollo LBO template—closing the deal extends Apollo's healthcare PE footprint to a top-tier scale asset.
- Apollo's track record on LBO exits (typically 5–7 years) implies a potential DePuy re-IPO or strategic sale between 2031–2033—a defined catalyst for APO distributable earnings through the holding period.
- Q2 2026 MedTech revenue $8.93B (up 4.5% operationally); orthopaedics grew 3.6%—the orthopedics franchise is no longer the growth engine.
- Net $20B cash inflow from a sale (vs the ~$19.3B JNJ paid to acquire Synthes in 2012) returns essentially zero capital after 14 years of operating investment—highlights how much MedTech R&D was absorbed by orthopedics.
- Capital redeployment into higher-growth MedTech segments (cardiovascular, surgical robotics, vision) should improve JNJ's blended MedTech growth rate—bullish for the multiple if cash is used for buybacks or M&A.
