The filing
DayOne's $20B ask is the first Asian colo IPO of the AI capex cycle
DayOne Data Centers Limited filed a Form F-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2026, applying to list American Depositary Shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker \"DODC\" (SEC file number 333-299299). The Singapore-headquartered developer, led by CEO Jamie Khoo, is targeting a raise of as much as ~$5 billion at a ~$20 billion pre-money valuation, according to people familiar with the matter cited by Reuters and Bloomberg. Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, BofA Securities and Citigroup are leading the deal, with BNP Paribas in a senior role.
F-1 filing date
Oct 5, 2026
SEC accession 0001193125-26-414188
Proposed ticker
DODC
Nasdaq Global Select Market; ADS structure
Target valuation
~$20B
Up to ~$5B raise per Reuters/Bloomberg
Lead underwriters
4
Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, BofA, Citi
Booked capacity
2.3 GW
As of Sep 20, 2026, per Form F-1
Capacity in service
675 MW
Jun 30, 2026; vs 49 MW at YE 2023
The numbers
3.4x revenue growth masks a customer-concentration landmine
DayOne's H1 2026 numbers are striking on the surface: revenue of $512.0 million versus $151.5 million a year earlier, a 3.4x jump. Adjusted EBITDA hit $205.9 million on a 40.2% margin, up from 32.3% in H1 2025. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $484.3 million versus $178.1 million in 2024. Bookings climbed from 537 MW at the end of March 2025 to 1,786 MW at June 30, 2026, while capacity in service nearly quadrupled to 675 MW from 153 MW over the same period. Utilization is already at 98.7%, with98.8% pre-committed — a profile closer to a contracted utility than a real estate developer.
Underneath those numbers, the F-1 reveals a single-customer dependency that the prospectus itself discloses: the largest customer accounted for 69.4% of 2025 revenue and 69.2% of H1 2026 revenue; the second-largest represented 12.3% and 15.1%. Combined, the top two customers deliver roughly 82% to 84% of revenue. That concentration, paired with $4.35 billion of long-term debt against negative total equity of −$25.1 million at June 30, 2026, is the structural risk the multiple expansion has to outrun.
| Metric | H1 2026 | H1 2025 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (US$ M) | 512.0 | 151.5 | 484.3 | 178.1 |
| Adj. EBITDA (US$ M) | 205.9 | 48.9 | 180.7 | 56.2 |
| Adj. EBITDA margin | 40.2% | 32.3% | 37.3% | 31.6% |
| Net loss (US$ M) | (77.2) | (12.6) | (367.1) | (57.6) |
| Backlog (US$ M) | 1,120 | 550 | 807 | n/a |
| Capacity in service (MW) | 675 | 222 | 454 | n/a |
Capacity is scaling faster than revenue can monetize
MW operating vs. MW under construction, quarterly, F-1
Unit: MW in service
Q1 2025
153
Q2 2025
222
Q3 2025
378
Q4 2025
454
Q1 2026
483
Q2 2026
675
The valuation
DayOne prices at ~54x EBITDA — twice Digital Realty and Equinix
At a ~$20 billion equity valuation, DayOne's implied enterprise value is roughly $22.4 billion after subtracting $1.98 billion of cash from $4.35 billion of long-term borrowings. Against H1 2026 adjusted EBITDA of $205.9 million — annualized to ~$411.8 million — that is roughly 54x EV/EBITDA. On the more conservative FY2025 EBITDA base of $180.7 million, the multiple stretches to ~124x. Either number sits far above the listed peer set.
| Company | EV/Sales (TTM) | EV/EBITDA (TTM) | Reported currency |
|---|---|---|---|
| DayOne (proposed IPO) | ~17.4x | ~54x | USD |
| Equinix | 12.5x | 27.5x | USD |
| Digital Realty | 12.1x | 24.3x | USD |
| Iron Mountain | 26.2x | 30.6x | USD |
| GDS Holdings | 5.9x | 13.3x | CNY |
The premium is roughly 2x Digital Realty and Equinix, and 4x GDS Holdings — DayOne's closest Asian peer and former parent, which still holds a residual stake after selling $385 million of DayOne shares back to the company in January 2026. The premium implies that public investors will price DayOne as AI infrastructure, not as a traditional colo REIT — a categorization that hinges on whether the 69% one-customer relationship is treated as contracted infrastructure or as a single-tenant credit exposure.
Supply chain
Who actually holds DayOne together — and who loses if the deal re-prices
DayOne's growth story depends on a stack of counterparties that investors rarely see in a headline. The F-1 explicitly names \"utilities, property owners, module integrators, equipment suppliers, contractors and logistics providers\" as project-execution dependencies, with cross-region shipping risks (cargo space, customs, inspections, duties) and limited third-party module integrators as disclosed supply-chain bottlenecks. Cooling depends on third-party utilities and government approvals — a non-trivial risk given Trump's export-control posture toward Southeast Asian cloud routes.
- NVIDIA is DayOne's strategic AI-factory anchor, not a direct equity holder — the 360MW Firmus/DayOne Batam campus under construction packages up to 170,000 Nvidia AI accelerators through 2028, providing the demand-side AI tenant that justifies DayOne's premium multiple.
- Module integrators and power utilities are the unpriced bottlenecks: DayOne's prefabricated build model relies on a limited number of module integrators and on third-party power offtake, with cooling requiring significant water access controlled by utilities and government permits.
- GDS Holdings is DayOne's former parent and still holds an equity stake after the $385M January 2026 buyback; DayOne's IPO would crystallize the value of that residual holding at a premium to GDS's own TTM EV/EBITDA of 13.3x.
- Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon) are the implicit10-customer Johor cluster — but the F-1 has not named the largest 69% customer, leaving investors to infer whether that anchor is a single hyperscaler or an AI-native tenant cluster.
The single-tenant risk cuts in two directions. If the undisclosed anchor customer is one of the big three U.S. hyperscalers — and the F-1 reports 10 customers in Johor with ~1.4 GW of bookings and 2.3 GW total bookings globally as of September 20 — then the customer is AAA-rated and DayOne looks like contracted utility cash flow. If the anchor is a single AI-native tenant like OpenAI or an equivalent, the picture resembles SoftBank-backed SB Energy, whose planned $60 billion IPO was shelved in part over concerns about single-customer exposure.
Macro context
Why now — Singapore tariff, AI capex, and a queue of rival filings
Three forces are colliding around the filing window. The Trump administration imposed a 12.5% tariff on Singapore-origin exports in August 2026, affecting roughly S$9.5 billion ($7.4 billion) of Singapore's exports to the U.S. — a backdrop hostile to Singapore-domiciled issuers even when services are not tariffed directly. At the same time, the administration is preparing new AI diffusion export controls aimed at blocking Chinese access to remote AI servers routed through third countries, with the Bureau of Industry and Security confirming on June 1, 2026 that export controls cover Nvidia Blackwell and Rubin chips. DayOne's Batam, Malaysia, and Johor footprint sits squarely inside that policy crossfire.
On the demand side, AI-related capital spending by the six biggest U.S. tech companies is projected by Moody's to reach roughly $1 trillion in 2027, more than double the 2024 base — a tailwind large enough to absorb multiple new public colo issuers. DayOne is not alone in the queue: Reuters reports that Switch, Vantage Data Centers, CyrusOne, and Nvidia-backed Reflection AI are all lined up to test public markets, and SB Energy's $60 billion IPO was delayed specifically over single-customer concerns. DayOne will set the precedent for every Asian filing that follows it.
| Issuer | Status | Key investor concern |
|---|---|---|
| DayOne (DODC) | F-1 filed Oct 5, 2026 | 69% top-customer concentration |
| SB Energy (SoftBank) | IPO delayed Sep 2026 | OpenAI single-customer reliance |
| Switch | Preparing for 2027 listing | Power-pipeline visibility |
| Vantage Data Centers | Reportedly preparing | Hyperscaler mix disclosure |
| CyrusOne | Reportedly preparing | Customer diversification |
| Reflection AI (Nvidia-backed) | Active IPO plans | Concentration, valuation gap |
Horizons
Short-term vs. long-term — what moves first, what holds the thesis
Short-term (days to quarters), the price-discovery event is the F-1 amendment and the roadshow expected mid-October, with pricing targeted for November 2026 per Reuters. The single binary catalyst is the largest-customer disclosure that will arrive in the next F-1 amendment; if the anchor is named and rated, the 69% concentration turns from headline risk into contracted-revenue proof, and DayOne clears the bar at a richer multiple than peers. If the anchor remains unnamed or is identified as a single AI-native tenant rather than an investment-grade hyperscaler, the IPO prices at a discount to the $20 billion ask or pulls altogether — mirroring the SB Energy delay.
Long-term (one to three years), the structural driver is whether AI capex sustains the implied $1 trillion 2027 run-rate. If it does, DayOne's 2.3 GW backlog converts to ~$2.5 billion to $4.0 billion of annualized revenue at industry-standard $1.10 to $1.75 per MW-month pricing, supporting the implied multiple. The main risks to the thesis are: (1) a single-customer renegotiation if the anchor hyperscaler signs direct-lease alternatives with Equinix or Digital Realty; (2) the Singapore tariff expanding into services; (4) NVIDIA channel shifting toward its own AI factory builds (Firmus, SB Energy) rather than via DayOne; and (4) book conversion slowing once the 1,125 MW under-construction pipeline attempts to ramp through 2027.
Stocks this filing actually touches
- DayOne's $20B pre-money valuation prices DayOne at ~4x GDS Holdings's own TTM EV/EBITDA of 13.3x — a successful IPO crystallizes GDS's residual stake at a premium to GDS's standalone multiple, plausibly clear-cut on a successful November pricing.
- GDS Holdings still owns DayOne equity after the $385M buyback in January 2026; DayOne's Nasdaq listing under DODC unlocks mark-to-market value of that stake and removes the deconsolidation overhang weighing on GDS.
- If DayOne re-prices lower or pulls, GDS Holdings loses the read-through premium and the relationship becomes a structural drag rather than an asset — exposure is concentrated in the November pricing event.
- Digital Realty's 24.3x TTM EV/EBITDA sets the floor for Asian AI-infrastructure pricing — if DayOne clears at ~54x on Nov 2026 pricing, the read-through pulls DLR's multiple higher over the following quarter, lifting Multi-Year AUM benchmarks.
- But if the largest customer in DayOne's F-1 turns out to be a Microsoft or Alphabet tenant currently routing through DLR, DayOne's listing becomes a competitive threat — DLR would face direct pricing pressure on its 2.5 GW Asia-Pacific pipeline.
- Digital Realty has guided to roughly 8% core FFO growth in 2026 — that trajectory is the bear-case anchor if DayOne's premium rerates the entire sector higher.
- Equinix's 27.5x TTM EV/EBITDA is the closest peer comparable to DayOne's ~54x ask — a successful DayOne pricing would rerate EQIX higher by ~10-15% on multiple expansion over 1-3 years, plausibly clearing-the-market multiple trajectory.
- Equinix's record annualized gross bookings of $474M (+42% YoY) in Q1 2026 demonstrate that broader customer diversification is achievable at scale — DayOne's 69% concentration highlights what EQIX has structurally avoided, a structural advantage if DayOne re-prices lower.
- Near-term (days to quarters), EQIX faces direct hyperscaler comparison risk in Asia-Pacific where DayOne now has 2.3 GW of bookings — watch the November pricing for read-through to EQIX's Asian expansion capex.
- Iron Mountain trades at 30.6x TTM EV/EBITDA — the highest in the U.S. listed colo set — making it the structural cousin to DayOne's premium-pricing strategy. A successful DayOne IPO would validate Iron Mountain's premium multiple and likely lift the multiple by 10-15%.
- Iron Mountain's data-center segment growth is the lever — its colocation expansion has driven FY2025 EBITDA margin above 55%; if DayOne re-prices lower in November, Iron Mountain's premium is the most exposed to compression.
- The November pricing of DayOne is the binary catalyst — Iron Mountain is the most rate-sensitive colo to the read-through.
- NVIDIA is DayOne's AI-factory anchor via the 360MW Firmus/DayOne Batam partnership packaging up to 170,000 NVIDIA AI accelerators through 2028 — DayOne's $20B Nasdaq ask validates NVIDIA's AI-factory deployment model and supports continued demand for Blackwell and Rubin chips.
- NVIDIA's revenue exposure to the DayOne/Firmus ecosystem is up to $30B over six years per the Firmus disclosure — DayOne's IPO crystallizes that revenue pipeline into a mark-to-market equity story.
- Watch Q1 FY2027 NVIDIA earnings for DayOne/Firmus-related disclosure of on a quarterly cadence; the catalyst is the November DayOne pricing event.
- SoftBank Group's Vision Fund is a current DayOne shareholder; a successful $20B IPO pricing clears a major private-markets holding at a premium to the June 2026 Series C valuation, plausibly lifting the mark-to-market NAV by 5-10% on DayOne pricing.
- SoftBank Group's broader AI-infrastructure thesis (SB Energy, DayOne, OpenAI, NVIDIA) faces a credibility test at DayOne's pricing — a successful IPO clears the SB Energy IPO blockage and supports SoftBank Group's AI infrastructure narrative.
- Main risk: if DayOne's anchor customer is identified as the same AI-native entity underwriting SB Energy's delayed IPO, the two deals collapse together — exposure is concentrated in the November pricing event.
