The third-quarter trading update, published on 3 November 2026, reads like a growth story: group revenue rose 5.8% on an FX-neutral basis to €5.76bn, unit case volume grew 3.5%, revenue per unit case grew 2.2%, and the full-year outlook was left untouched. The number worth dissecting is buried in that outlook. Cost of sales per unit case rose 0.6% in the first half against a full-year guide of roughly 1.5%, so the guide requires a second-half cost line running near 2.4% per unit case — above the 2.2% of revenue-per-case growth actually delivered in the quarter.
Q3 2026 revenue
€5.76bn
Quarter ended 2 Oct 2026; +5.8% FX-neutral, +6.5% as reported
Revenue per unit case
+2.2%
Q3 2026 versus Q3 2025, comparable basis
Implied H2 cost per unit case
~2.4%
Our estimate from the 1.5% full-year guide and the 0.6% first-half outturn
FY26 commodity hedging
>95%
Up from 85% at the Q1 2026 update; FY27 coverage not disclosed
FY26 free cash flow guide
€1.7bn
At least €1.7bn guided, against €2.20bn generated in FY2025
Net debt to EBITDA
2.7x
Net debt of €10.28bn at 3 July 2026; Fitch rating 'A-'
The print
Growth Came From Volume and Mix, Not From a Cleaner Cost Line
Two of the three levers in the quarter were volume and mix: unit cases grew 3.5% and revenue per unit case 2.2%, with the release attributing the pricing gain to promotional optimisation, positive pack mix and headline pricing rather than to list-price increases alone. Europe did the heavy lifting on price, with revenue per unit case up 2.9%, while Australia, the Pacific and Southeast Asia managed only 1.4% — half the European rate — even as their volume grew 6.4%. Asia defended margin with cases, not with price, and that is the pattern that leaves the cost line exposed.
| Q3 2026 (quarter ended 2 Oct 2026) | Europe | Australia, Pacific and SE Asia | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (€m) | 4,436 | 1,328 | 5,764 |
| Revenue growth, as reported | +5.8% | +9.2% | +6.5% |
| Revenue growth, FX-neutral | +5.2% | +7.8% | +5.8% |
| Volume growth | +2.3% | +6.4% | +3.5% |
| Revenue per unit case (€) | 6.16 | 3.96 | 5.46 |
| Revenue per unit case growth | +2.9% | +1.4% | +2.2% |
- Coca-Cola Trademark volume was led by Coke Zero Sugar volume grew 9.7%, with sports volumes up 10.8% and energy up 17.3% on innovation.
- Away-from-home volume grew 3.8% against 3.4% at home, so the channel mix was mildly favourable rather than the source of the pricing gap.
- Year-to-date volumes rose 2.7% on a days-adjusted basis: Europe 1.7%, Australia, Pacific and Southeast Asia 4.4%.
- The company flagged a challenging consumer environment and said the geopolitical situation lifted its operating costs.
- A second-half interim dividend of €1.42 per share takes the full-year dividend to €2.24, keeping the payout ratio near 50%.
The arithmetic
The 1.5% Cost Guide Is a Second-Half Number, and Q3 Pricing Barely Cleared It
First-half cost of sales per unit case rose 0.6% on a comparable basis against a full-year guide of roughly 1.5%. With first-half volume of about 2,030m unit cases (Europe 1.3bn, Australia, Pacific and Southeast Asia 733m) against 1,048m in the third quarter alone, the full-year target back-solves to second-half cost inflation of roughly 2.4% per unit case, close to four times the first-half rate. Third-quarter revenue per unit case grew 2.2%, so on a like-for-like basis the price lever covered most, but not all, of the cost line the guidance implies. Two caveats: mix moves both lines, and the full-year revenue guide of 3-4% against year-to-date volumes of +2.7% implies revenue per unit case near +1% for the whole year, which implies the first half was close to flat on a comparable basis. Volume and savings, not pricing, have to carry the 7% operating profit guide.
Cost per unit case: the guide hides a second-half acceleration
First-half cost outturn against the full-year guide, the second-half rate the guide implies, and the revenue-per-case growth actually delivered in the third quarter. The implied second-half figure is our estimate, assuming fourth-quarter volume in line with the third quarter.
Unit: % growth, comparable and FX-neutral
H1 2026 cost per unit case (actual)
Comparable basis, six months to 3 July 2026
0.6%
Implied H2 2026 cost per unit case
Back-solved from the 1.5% full-year guide
2.4%
FY2026 cost per unit case (guided)
Guidance unchanged on 3 November 2026
1.5%
Q3 2026 revenue per unit case (actual)
Comparable basis
2.2%
Mechanism
Concentrate Passes Through to Revenue; Aluminium and PET Do Not
The company's own guidance makes the asymmetry explicit: concentrate is directly linked to revenue per unit case through incidence pricing, so a rise in the concentrate price — which is where juice and sweetener costs live — lifts the bottler's cost line and its revenue line at the same time. Aluminium can sheet, PET resin, glass and freight are different. They are the bottler's own costs, they arrive whether or not the consumer pays more, and they are not covered by any pricing formula. Sweetener inflation passes through the concentrate, while metal inflation lands on the bottler.
- Metal passed through the can layer without lifting its earnings: Ball's North and Central America beverage sales rose to $2.00bn in Q2 2026 while segment comparable operating earnings fell to $207m from $212m, with the company citing higher volume and price/mix primarily attributable to higher aluminium prices.
- Crown Holdings passed $405m of higher material cost through in Q3 2026 net sales while global beverage can volumes rose 6% — double-digit in Asia, 6% in North America and 4% in Europe — and said volume growth offset the majority of rising input cost pressures.
- Shanghai Baosteel Packaging, China's listed metal-packaging maker, grew Q3 2026 revenue 24% to CNY2.86bn on a gross margin of 9.2% against 7.6% a year earlier: the can layer's revenue inflates with metal while its own margin stays thin.
- Ball's global aluminium packaging shipments rose 4.3% in Q2 2026, so can demand is not the problem in this chain — the metal price is.
Aluminium is where the money leaks: the London benchmark stood at $3,044 per tonne on 3 November 2026, and the 2026 average of $3,328 compares with $2,631 in 2025. European bottle-grade PET was $1.56 per kilogram in September, up 4% on the year, and European PET suppliers have been consolidating because they are struggling to pass higher costs into contract prices — that bill lands with converters and bottlers. Investors should be careful about assuming the London print is a China story: Aluminum Corporation of China trades at 8.5x trailing earnings close to its 52-week low even with the benchmark averaging $3,328 per tonne in 2026, so the two markets do not translate one for one.
The split
The Brand Owner Raised Its Outlook; the Bottler Reaffirmed Its Own
A week before the bottler's update, Coca-Cola reported third-quarter net revenues up 7% to $13.4bn, unit case volume up 5%, and raised its 2026 outlook to at least 5% organic revenue growth, at least 11% comparable EPS growth and free cash flow of at least $13.0bn. The brand took just 1% of price and mix and still expanded operating margin by 140 basis points to 33.4%, because its profit pool is concentrate — a sugar-and-juice business with no metal in it. The brand absorbs the metal shock and still raises guidance; the bottler absorbs the same shock and has to hold its outlook.
| Measure | Coca-Cola — brand owner | Coca-Cola Europacific Partners — bottler |
|---|---|---|
| Latest reported revenue | $13.4bn, +7% (Q3 2026) | €5.76bn, +5.8% FX-neutral (Q3 2026) |
| Volume | Unit case volume +5% (Q3 2026) | Unit cases +3.5% (Q3 2026) |
| Price realisation | Price/mix +1% on concentrate sales (Q3 2026) | Revenue per unit case +2.2% (Q3 2026) |
| Gross margin | 63.2% (Q3 2026) | 35.3% (H1 2026) |
| Operating margin | 33.4% (Q3 2026) | 13.6% (H1 2026) |
| 2026 guidance | Organic revenue at least +5%; comparable EPS at least +11%; FCF at least $13.0bn | Revenue +3-4%; operating profit +7%; cost per unit case ~1.5%; FCF at least €1.7bn |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 1.4x | 2.7x |
| EV/EBITDA (market close, 3 Nov 2026) | 21.6x | 14.6x |
A cash statement explains the rest. The bottler generated €2.20bn of free cash flow in FY2025 — €2.95bn of operating cash flow against €0.75bn of capital expenditure — but guides to at least €1.7bn for FY2026 while stepping capital expenditure up to 5% of revenue, roughly €1.1bn, and paying a rising interest bill (H1 interest expense of €148m against €98m a year earlier). Net debt rose to €10.28bn at 3 July 2026 from €9.82bn at the year end, with a €2.24 dividend and the continuing buyback on top. Capex and interest, not trading, explain the drop in cash generation.
Elasticity
Where the Same Cost Shock Meets a Consumer That Will Not Pay, Revenue Falls
The cost shock is not unique; the resilience is. In China, China Resources Beverage — the Coca-Cola bottler in the world's largest soft-drink market — saw first-half 2026 revenue fall 11.5% to CNY5.38bn, with operating income down 23% and net income down 26%, even though its gross margin actually widened to 47.6%. The margin defence came from mix and cost control, not price, and it cost the top line. In Japan, Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan reported third-quarter revenue down 5.6% to ¥250.7bn with gross margin slipping about 70 basis points to 45.5%. Against those two, Nongfu Spring grew first-half revenue 14.4% to CNY29.31bn, widened gross margin to 60.9% and lifted operating profit 18.5%. The same metal and resin bill produces opposite outcomes depending on whether the consumer accepts a higher price.
| Company (latest reported period) | Revenue | Gross margin | Operating profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (Q3 2026) | €5.76bn, +5.8% FX-neutral | 35.3% (H1 2026) | +8.1% comparable (H1 2026) |
| Coca-Cola (Q3 2026) | $13.4bn, +7% | 63.2% | +12% |
| China Resources Beverage (H1 2026) | CNY5.38bn, -11.5% | 47.6%, up ~90bp | -23% |
| Nongfu Spring (H1 2026) | CNY29.31bn, +14.4% | 60.9%, up ~60bp | +18.5% |
Horizons
This Year Is Hedged; Next Year Is Not
Over the next two to three quarters, the question is narrow and checkable: did second-half pricing cover the cost line the guidance embeds? Nothing in the third-quarter release settles it, because the update carries revenue, volume and price but no cost outturn. The February 2027 full-year results are the first check on the implied 2.4% second-half cost rate, and the fourth-quarter trading update before it will show whether revenue per unit case held near 2.2%.
- The €1.42 second-half interim dividend is paid on 3 December 2026 to shareholders of record on 20 November, with the full-year dividend at €2.24 and the payout ratio near 50%.
- Ball and Crown report before the bottler does, so their Q3 and Q4 prints set the metal-cost backdrop for the fourth quarter and for 2027 hedge volumes.
- Weekly share repurchases continued into October, so the per-share outcome depends on the buyback as well as on operating profit.
- The full-year result is where 2027 commodity hedge coverage should be disclosed, and it is currently the largest undisclosed variable in the cost line.
For the next one to three years, the exposure is not this year's cost line but next year's. Commodity hedging has been lifted from 85% for FY26 at the April update to more than 95% by November, so the 1.5% guide is largely locked and the market's attention should move to the FY27 hedge book priced off a $3,044 per tonne aluminium benchmark. Two structural features matter alongside it: capital expenditure of 5% of revenue takes free cash flow below the FY2025 level even with profit growth, and net debt of €10.28bn at 2.7x EBITDA leaves limited room to absorb another cost shock without the dividend or the buyback giving way. The company's own framing — a challenging consumer environment and higher operating costs from the geopolitical situation — is the risk in one sentence: the bottler has hedged this year's metal and left next year's open.
Who actually carries the metal shock
- The 1.5% full-year cost guide back-solves to roughly 2.4% cost per unit case in H2, against 2.2% revenue per case growth in Q3 2026.
- The arithmetic is unforgiving: H2 pricing of 2.2% against implied H2 costs of 2.4% leaves the 7% operating profit guide dependent on volume, mix and savings.
- Commodity hedging above 95% for FY26 removes near-term cost risk but leaves the FY27 book to be priced at $3,044 per tonne of aluminium.
- Free cash flow of at least €1.7bn against €2.20bn in FY2025, with net debt at €10.28bn, means capex and interest take the cash that trading generated.
- Third-quarter operating margin expanded 140 basis points to 33.4% on only 1% price/mix, so the brand layer does not need pricing to absorb metal.
- Guidance was raised to at least 5% organic revenue growth and at least 11% comparable EPS growth with free cash flow of at least $13.0bn, up from about $12.4bn.
- Concentrate is a sugar-and-juice product with no metal in it, so packaging inflation accrues to the bottler rather than to the brand.
- Over the next year, 21.6x EV/EBITDA against the bottler's 14.6x keeps the premium with the layer that holds pricing power.
- Over 2026, global aluminium packaging shipments growing 4.3% confirm that can demand, not volume weakness, is the industry's problem.
- North and Central America beverage sales rose to $2.00bn on higher aluminium prices while segment comparable operating earnings fell to $207m from $212m.
- Metal pass-through inflates a can maker's revenue without lifting its earnings, which is exactly the squeeze it creates for the bottler.
- With net debt at 3.1x EBITDA and 11.6x EV/EBITDA, the can layer has less room than the bottler to absorb another metal leg up.
- Global beverage can volumes rose 6% in Q3 2026, with double-digit growth in Asia, 6% in North America and 4% in Europe.
- $405m of higher material cost was passed through in net sales, with volume growth absorbing the majority of rising input cost pressures.
- Volume growth plus full metal pass-through supports 2026 adjusted earnings of $8.35-8.45 per share and adjusted free cash flow of at least $950m.
- Crown's European can shipments grew 4% while CCEP's European volume grew 2.3%, suggesting the can layer's demand growth runs ahead of this bottler's.
- First-half 2026 revenue fell 11.5% to CNY5.38bn and operating income fell 23%, showing what happens at the bottling layer when the consumer refuses price.
- Gross margin still widened to 47.6%, so the defence was mix and cost control rather than price.
- The gap between CRB's -11.5% and CCEP's +5.8% FX-neutral revenue growth is consumer elasticity, not input cost: both buy the same cans and resin.
- Over the next 12 months, trading on 8.5x EV/EBITDA with net cash and a 5.6% yield, much of the revenue decline looks priced in.
- First-half 2026 revenue grew 14.4% to CNY29.31bn with gross margin widening to 60.9%, proof that branded packaged drinks can price through the same input basket.
- Net cash and a 44.4% return on equity give it the option to fund capacity while bottlers defend volume.
- Revenue growth of 14.4% with operating profit up 18.5% shows the pricing elasticity CCEP cannot access in Asia-Pacific.
- At 23.5x trailing earnings the brand premium is already in the price, so over one to three years the catalyst is sustained volume, not re-rating.
- Third-quarter FY2026 revenue fell 5.6% to ¥250.7bn with gross margin slipping about 70 basis points to 45.5%.
- Revenue falling while margin compresses shows a Japanese bottler with neither CCEP's European pricing nor Nongfu Spring's brand mix to absorb can-sheet cost.
- At about 40x trailing earnings with a 4.8% return on equity, the shares need a volume recovery over the next 12 months that has not yet appeared.
- Net debt of 1.3x EBITDA is far less stretched than the Chinese can makers, so the balance sheet is not the binding constraint.
- Third-quarter 2026 revenue rose 24% to CNY2.86bn on a gross margin of 9.2%, against 7.6% a year earlier.
- Revenue inflating on metal pass-through while the operating margin stays near 3.3% shows the can layer's economics are set by the metal price, not by the beverage brand.
- Net debt at 5.1x EBITDA and negative trailing free cash flow leave the smallest can makers funding the cycle with debt.
- Into FY27, aluminium strength reaches beverage-packaging profit only where domestic pricing and metal pass-through line up.
