China's AI-Unwind Safe Harbour Has a State-Sponsored Buyer; India's Refuge Runs on Oil, Not Chips insight cover
Markets / EventBABA · PDD · 000660.KS•21 min read

China's AI-Unwind Safe Harbour Has a State-Sponsored Buyer; India's Refuge Runs on Oil, Not Chips

Goldman Sachs is right that China and India are where money goes as the AI hardware trade unwinds — but the mechanism matters more than the call. China's marginal buyer is no longer a foreign institution: state funds bought an estimated RMB 170 billion of onshore ETFs in October, on top of a stock of Chinese equities Goldman puts at roughly RMB 6 trillion, about 6% of the mainland market's capitalisation. That price-insensitive bid is what lets China internet names such as Tencent trade on 9.7x enterprise value to EBITDA with a beta of 0.73 while NVIDIA trades on 18.8x with a beta of 2.22. India's refuge runs on a different engine — a sliding oil import bill and the largest one-day foreign purchase since February 2021 — and it reverses faster than Beijing's bid does. The catch is that the state buys blue chips, not the AI complex, so Alibaba is still spending RMB 155 billion of capex a year with negative free cash flow, and the same national team sold at least US$123 billion of ETFs in January 2026.

Published Nov 6, 2026Updated Nov 6, 2026

State ETF buying, October 2026

RMB 170bn

Goldman Sachs estimate; Bank of America puts the figure above RMB 110bn

National team stock of Chinese equities

~RMB 6tn

About 6% of onshore market capitalisation, Goldman estimate as of end-September 2025

Largest daily foreign purchase in Indian equitie

Rs 14,796 cr

Nov 5, 2026 — about US$1.6bn, the biggest session since Feb 24, 2021

Hang Seng Tech, Nov 5, 2026

+5.6%

Best single-day gain since February 2025, with Alibaba and Tencent leading

On Friday, November 6, 2026, the AI trade and its supposed safe harbour moved in opposite directions on the tape. NVIDIA fell 9.3% and SK hynix fell 10.4%, while Alibaba rose 2.6% and PDD Holdings rose 2.2%. In India, the Nifty 50 was up 0.51% at 24,662.80 as a sliding crude price improved the import bill. Goldman's case that China and India absorb the money leaving AI hardware holds up for a reason it did not spell out.

State ETF buying, October 2026

RMB 170bn

Goldman Sachs estimate; Bank of America puts the figure above RMB 110bn

National team stock of Chinese equities

~RMB 6tn

About 6% of onshore market capitalisation, Goldman estimate as of end-September 2025

Largest daily foreign purchase in Indian equities

Rs 14,796 cr

Nov 5, 2026 — about US$1.6bn, the biggest session since Feb 24, 2021

Hang Seng Tech, Nov 5, 2026

+5.6%

Best single-day gain since February 2025, with Alibaba and Tencent leading

Nvidia and SK hynix, Nov 6, 2026

-9.3% / -10.4%

The AI hardware complex sold off as the rotation continued

China Merchants Bank price to book

0.92x

Nov 6, 2026 close of CNY 41.77, with a 4.8% dividend yield

The tape

One Session Laid Out the Whole Rotation

The unwinding trade and the refuge trade carry opposite market betas, and on November 6 that difference showed up in prices. The most market-sensitive names — SK hynix at 2.41 and NVIDIA at 2.22 — were hit hardest, falling 62% and 25% below their respective 52-week highs. The low-correlation names barely moved: PDD Holdings carries an effective beta of zero and Kweichow Moutai sits at 0.38. Rotation into a refuge should leave a beta spread, and this one did.

Market close, November 6, 2026. Multiples on trailing twelve-month company-reported earnings.
NameNov 6, 2026From 52-week highP/E (TTM)EV/EBITDA (TTM)Beta
NVIDIA-9.3%-25%22.8x18.8x2.22
SK hynix-10.4%-62%4.3x3.6x2.41
Samsung Electronics-5.6%-49%5.7x3.2x1.48
Alibaba+2.6%-40%24.0x12.6x0.44
PDD Holdings+2.2%-40%8.4x4.8x-0.01
Tencent-2.1%-36%13.9x9.7x0.73
Kweichow Moutai-0.4%-20%19.2x15.4x0.38
China Merchants Bank-0.1%-5%7.2xn.m.0.54

This is not a claim that China or India is cheap in absolute terms — every name in the table except NVIDIA is well below its own 52-week high. The narrower point is mechanical: when a global investor trims AI exposure, the money has to land somewhere, and these are the names whose returns have historically moved least with the market. Tencent's 0.73 beta and China Merchants Bank's 0.54 beta make them natural destinations for capital that wants to stay in Asia without re-expressing the AI bet.

The marginal buyer

Beijing's Balance Sheet Is Now the Price-Insensitive Buyer

Foreign institutions were the marginal buyer of Chinese equities through most of 2026. That buyer has been replaced. Goldman Sachs estimates state-backed investors — the national team — bought roughly RMB 170 billion of Chinese ETFs in October alone, against Bank of America's estimate of more than RMB 110 billion, and buying that began in mid-October accelerated into early November. Cumulative inflows over the two weeks to early November surpassed everything the national team took in during April 2025.

October 2026: Where the money went inside China's ETF market

Net inflows into mainland-listed equity ETFs, US$ million. The largest single category was large-cap state-owned enterprise products — the national team's home turf, not the AI complex.

Unit: US$ mn

All 1,329 mainland equity ETFs

58,570

Top 20 ETFs by inflow

52,260

Large-cap, state-owned enterprises

9,228

Large-cap, non-state-owned

7,066

STAR Market ETFs

6,720

Mega-cap ETFs

2,311

  • Six index ETFs each traded more than RMB 10 billion on November 3 — the first time that has happened since September 24, 2024.
  • Buying is concentrated in CSI 300-linked products, the blue-chip benchmark the national team has historically used to move prices.
  • Goldman puts the national team's stock of Chinese equities at roughly RMB 6 trillion, about 6% of the onshore market's capitalisation.
  • Central Huijin, the sovereign wealth fund's investment arm, has led most intervention since 2023 and had assembled about US$180 billion of ETFs by the end of August.
  • The state is also widening the plumbing: a new one-year PBOC swap facility opened on November 3, and 31 brokers and fund managers applied for more than RMB 100 billion of liquidity through it.
The policy toolkit assembled since the October sell-off, and the precedent it echoes.
MeasureDetailDate
PBOC swap facilityNew one-year facility letting institutions swap illiquid assets for liquid ones to buy stocks; more than RMB 100bn applied for by 31 firmsNov 2–3, 2026
Buyback re-lending rateCut 25 basis points to 1%, and major technology companies urged to repurchase sharesNov 2, 2026
State ETF purchasesGoldman estimates roughly RMB 170bn (US$25.5bn) of ETFs bought in October; Bank of America puts it above RMB 110bnOct 2026
CSI 300 ETF turnoverSix index ETFs traded more than RMB 10bn each on Nov 3 — first since Sept 24, 2024Nov 3, 2026
Leveraged tradingCurb on margin trading eased as part of the same joint PBoC and CSRC packageNov 2, 2026
Offshore yuan issuanceYulan, an offshore yuan bond structure, made its debut in Dubai alongside the equity supportOct 2026
PrecedentSept 24, 2025 package: an RMB 500bn swap facility and an RMB 300bn re-lending facilitySept 24, 2025
The state bid is tactical, not structural. The same national team sold at least US$123 billion of ETFs in January 2026 to cool a rally it had helped create, and Goldman's own note is written around waiting for volume to recover. A state buyer puts a floor under the market without putting a trend under it.

India

India's Refuge Runs on Oil and Absence, Not on Tech

The Indian leg of the rotation is driven by a different variable. When investors began doubting the return on AI capital spending, the same doubts pushed crude lower, and a cheaper barrel shrinks India's import bill — the one large, mechanical tailwind available to an economy with little AI hardware exposure. On November 5, foreign investors bought Rs 14,796 crore of Indian equities, the largest single session since February 24, 2021, extending a five-session run worth Rs 20,835 crore.

Two refuges, two buyers, two exit doors.
China: onshore shares and H-sharesIndia
Who is buyingState funds through ETFs; Goldman estimates roughly RMB 170bn in October, with buying concentrated in CSI 300 productsForeign portfolio investors; Rs 14,796 crore on Nov 5, 2026, the largest day since Feb 24, 2021
TriggerPolicy: a new swap facility, a buyback re-lending rate cut to 1%, and state ETF purchasesLower crude prices plus an index with no material AI hardware exposure
Market levelCSI 300 closed at 4,036.30 on Oct 22, 20.2% below its June 22 peak and in a bear marketNifty 50 closed at 24,536.6 on Nov 5, up 2.4% on the day
Relative performanceHang Seng Tech gained 5.6% on Nov 5, its best session since February 2025The Nifty gained about 6% in the quarter to Nov 4 while the MSCI Asia Pacific index lost more than 7%
What reverses itThe state withdrawing, as it did in January 2026 when it sold at least US$123bn of ETFsA rebound in crude or a fresh bid for AI hardware pulling the same capital back out
FragilityGoldman is still waiting for volume to recover beyond the state bidA five-session foreign buying streak is momentum, not a re-rating

India's refuge is the more fragile of the two, and the reason is worth being precise about. China's floor is funded by a balance sheet that does not need the market to cooperate; India's floor depends on crude staying cheap and foreign sentiment staying bullish. Both conditions can reverse inside a week. Goldman's own framing is that India's recovery reflects a rotation out of north-Asian markets that carry heavier AI exposure — a statement about flows, not a structural re-rating.

Supply chain

The Unwind Bites Upstream, Where the Pricing Power Sits

The money leaving AI hardware is not leaving the build-out's economics; it is leaving the companies whose earnings are most levered to AI pricing. SK hynix has converted the HBM cycle into a trailing gross margin of 87.1% and a return on equity of 117%, and Samsung Electronics into trailing net income of KRW 213.3 trillion against KRW 44.3 trillion in 2025. At 4.3 times earnings after a 62% fall from its 52-week high, SK hynix is already priced for a collapse in memory pricing that has not yet reached the reported numbers.

  • Upstream: SK hynix and Samsung Electronics supply the high-bandwidth memory and foundry capacity the build-out consumes; they fell 10.4% and 5.6% on November 6.
  • Midstream: NVIDIA sells the accelerators that carry training workloads, and trailing revenue of US$303.0 billion sits on 22.8 times earnings after the day's 9.3% fall.
  • Downstream: the platforms being funded by that capex — Alibaba, Tencent, PDD Holdings — now trade on 1.8, 4.4 and 1.4 times sales respectively.
  • Demand-side substitute: Indian IT services absorbed the other side of the trade, with Infosys up 3.9% in the week to October 16 as clients slowed AI-linked discretionary work.

Beta to the broad market: the AI complex versus the refuge

Five-year beta estimates as of November 6, 2026. The rotation target is a basket of names whose returns have moved least with the market.

Unit: beta

Tencent

0.7

China Merchants Bank

0.5

Kweichow Moutai

0.4

Quality inside the haven

China's Safe Harbour Does Not Pay Everyone the Same Way

Buying a country's beta is not the same as buying its best businesses, and inside China the gap is now unusually wide. Tencent earns a 20.5% return on equity with a 5.5% free cash flow yield; PDD Holdings earns 22.0% with a 14.4% free cash flow yield and no meaningful market sensitivity; Alibaba earns 7.0% on a margin that is contracting. The state's own bid makes sense as a preference for balance sheets that pay dividends and need no one's permission: Kweichow Moutai at a 31.7% return on equity and a 4.2% dividend yield, China Merchants Bank at 0.92 times book with a 4.8% yield.

Trailing twelve-month company-reported figures and November 6, 2026 market data.
MetricTencentAlibabaPDD HoldingsChina Merchants BankKweichow Moutai
EV/EBITDA9.7x12.6x4.8xn.m.15.4x
Return on equity20.5%7.0%22.0%12.1%31.7%
Capex as % of revenue16.1%15.2%0.0%n.m.1.3%
Free cash flow yield5.5%-4.3%14.4%n.m.5.8%
Net cash positionNet debt 0.7x EBITDANet debt 0.5x EBITDANet cash, -0.9x EBITDAn.m.Net cash, -0.4x EBITDA
Price vs 52-week high-36%-40%-40%-5%-20%

Alibaba is the case that breaks the simple version of the story, and the evidence cuts both ways. Capital expenditure rose from RMB 33.2 billion in fiscal 2024 to RMB 155.5 billion on a trailing basis, and free cash flow swung from positive RMB 150.8 billion to negative RMB 77.5 billion, so operating margin compressed from 14.1% to 4.2% over the same window. But the spending is producing real output: cloud external revenue grew 45% year on year in the June 2026 quarter, the fastest in 22 quarters, and analysts expect AI cloud revenue to jump more than 50% in the September quarter.

Alibaba Group: the AI build-out funded entirely out of cash flow.
Alibaba, RMB bnFY2024FY2025FY2026TTM to Jun 30, 2026
Revenue941.2996.31,023.71,044.2
Operating income113.4140.959.744.0
Operating margin12.0%14.1%5.8%4.2%
Capital expenditure33.286.7126.9155.5
Free cash flow+150.8+78.2-50.7-77.5

Horizons

What Has to Be True Next, and What Breaks the Thesis

HorizonWhat to watchWhat breaks the thesis
Days to quartersAlibaba's September-quarter results, due in late November, and whether state ETF buying stays concentrated in CSI 300 productsA renewed slide in AI hardware that pulls global risk capital back out of Asia
Days to quartersWhether crude holds its November slide; the foreign bid into India is the most reversible leg of the tradeA rebound in crude or fresh disruption to Middle East supply
One to three yearsWhether state buying converts into broader volume — Goldman's note is explicitly waiting for thatThe state withdrawing as it did in January 2026, when it sold at least US$123bn of ETFs
One to three yearsWhether Chinese platform capex converts into cloud and advertising revenue or stays an expenseAI capex staying elevated while monetisation stalls; Alibaba's free cash flow is already negative RMB 77.5bn
One to three yearsWhether the memory up-cycle holds; SK hynix's 87.1% gross margin is the single biggest earnings variable in the AI complexMemory pricing normalising faster than expected, resetting a 117% return on equity
  • Near term, the leg to watch is India's foreign buying, because a momentum flow reverses faster than either of the other two.
  • Near term, China's bid is a floor rather than a driver, and Goldman's own note concedes volume has not recovered.
  • Over one to three years, the deciding variable is whether Alibaba's negative RMB 77.5 billion of free cash flow turns positive as AI capex growth decelerates.
  • Over one to three years, the largest earnings risk in the AI complex is SK hynix's 87.1% gross margin normalising, which would reset the profits the unwind is pricing.
The rotation is real and the buyer is changing hands, but the two refuges are not the same instrument. China's floor is a state balance sheet that can be withdrawn — it sold US$123 billion of ETFs in January 2026 — while India's floor is an oil price that can rebound. Neither justifies paying a growth multiple for the AI complex that is being unwound. Own the low-beta cash flows; treat the state bid as a put, not a promoter.

Where the rotation actually lands

0Tencent Holdings0700.HK--
--Vol --
-
Bullish
  • Tencent trades on 9.7x enterprise value to EBITDA with a 20.5% return on equity and a 0.73 beta, so it captures a rotation out of AI hardware without re-expressing it.
  • The 5.6% Hang Seng Tech gain on Nov 5, 2026 was led by Tencent and Alibaba; the durable leg depends on southbound and foreign demand, not state ETF buying.
  • Over one to three years, a 5.5% free cash flow yield with capex at 16.1% of revenue is the swing factor, and capital discipline matters more than the state bid.
BAlibaba GroupBABA--
--Vol --
-
Mixed
  • Alibaba trades on 1.8x sales but trailing free cash flow is negative RMB 77.5bn as capex reached RMB 155.5bn.
  • The bearish leg is a margin that has fallen to 4.2% from 14.1%; the bullish leg is that the same unwind pressuring AI capex budgets eventually slows the spending.
  • Near term, the catalyst is the September-quarter result due in late November, where analysts expect AI cloud revenue growth above 50%.
PPDD HoldingsPDD--
--Vol --
-
Mixed
  • PDD Holdings delivers a 22.0% return on equity with no market beta and no capex, so it absorbs the rotation without absorbing the risk.
  • At 8.4 times trailing earnings and 4.8 times enterprise value to EBITDA it is the cheapest of the China internet names in this list.
  • The offsetting fact is that trailing net income has fallen to RMB 92.1bn from RMB 112.4bn in 2024, and the company pays no dividend or buyback.
6Kweichow Moutai600519.SS--
--Vol --
-
Bullish
  • Kweichow Moutai is the most direct expression of the state bid, since large-cap state-owned enterprise products took US$9.2bn of October ETF inflows.
  • It earns a 31.7% return on equity on a 90.3% gross margin and pays a 4.2% dividend yield with a beta of 0.38, twenty percent below its 52-week high.
  • The risk is that the same state that buys it can sell it, as the national team did with at least US$123bn of ETFs in January 2026.
6China Merchants Bank600036.SS--
--Vol --
-
Bullish
  • China Merchants Bank trades at 0.92 times book with a 4.8% dividend yield and a 12.1% return on equity, so a state-buyer bid lands on one of the cheapest large banks anywhere.
  • Its 0.54 beta means the CSI 300 state bid does most of the work: the shares are 5% below their 52-week high while the index fell 20% from its June peak.
  • Near term, the catalyst is whether the national team keeps buying blue-chip CSI 300 products; the risk is the state reversing course.
0SK hynix000660.KS--
--Vol --
-
Bearish
  • SK hynix fell 10.4% on Nov 6 and sits 62% below its 52-week high at 4.3 times earnings, and the market is already discounting a collapse in memory pricing.
  • A trailing gross margin of 87.1% and a 117% return on equity make this the most stretched earnings base in the AI complex.
  • Over one to three years, normalising HBM pricing would remove the profit pool that still justifies even a low single-digit multiple.
0Samsung Electronics005930.KS--
--Vol --
-
Bearish
  • Samsung Electronics trades at 5.7 times earnings after a 49% fall from its 52-week high, and the memory earnings base cannot compound from these levels.
  • Trailing net income of KRW 213.3tn against KRW 44.3tn in 2025 shows how much of the profit pool is priced to AI hardware demand.
  • A 1.48 beta leaves no cushion if foreign selling out of Korea continues alongside the 5.6% drop on November 6.
NNVIDIANVDA--
--Vol --
-
Bearish
  • NVIDIA fell 9.3% on Nov 6 and is 25% below its 52-week high, but at 22.8 times trailing earnings it still carries a premium to the entire refuge complex.
  • Trailing revenue of US$303.0bn grew 40% over fiscal 2026's US$215.9bn, so the de-rating depends on forward capex guidance rather than the current income statement.
  • Over one to three years, if hyperscaler budgets reset, a 2.22 beta makes NVIDIA the largest single source of the outflow now funding China and India.