Fewer new medicine releases in Europe
27%
17 months after the May 12, 2025 pricing order, per a Wall Street Journal analysis published Nov. 9, 2026
Drop in non-orphan launches in the 11 EU joint-assessment states
-46.1%
Matched 12-month windows, May 2024-May 2025 versus May 2025-May 2026
Europe's share of world pharmaceutical sales
23.7%
2025, against 54.7% for North America
The reported event
Europe's 27% Launch Drop Is the Floor, Not the Ceiling
A Wall Street Journal analysis published on Nov. 9, 2026 put a number on a change that has been building since the executive order of May 12, 2025: 27% fewer new medicines launched in Europe over the following 17 months. Europe did not stop approving medicines — the EMA's committee for human medicines recommended 66 new medicines through its September 2026 meeting — so what is missing is a commercial decision, not a scientific one. The order ties US reimbursement to the lowest price paid in up to 19 European reference countries, so every European launch is now also a decision about a price that travels back to America. US pricing policy now sets the launch calendar for every new medicine sold in Europe, and 27% is the mildest version of that arithmetic.
How far launches fell, by market and by measure
Decline in new medicine launches across four independent counts. The United States figure uses the same matched windows as the EU measures.
Unit: Decline in new medicine launches versus the prior comparable period
Wall Street Journal, 17 months
27%
GlobalData, 10 months
35%
GlobalData, 14 months
43%
19-country reference basket
29.9%
11 EU joint-assessment states
37.8%
Non-orphan drugs, 11 EU states
46.1%
United States
10.5%
| Measure | Window | Change in launches | Geography |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Street Journal analysis | 17 months from May 2025 | -27% | Europe, all new medicines |
| GlobalData | 10 months from May 2025 | -35% | EU markets |
| GlobalData | 14 months from May 2025 | -43% | 14 European reference countries |
| Matched-window study | May 2024-May 2025 vs May 2025-May 2026 | -29.9% | 19-country reference basket |
| Matched-window study | May 2024-May 2025 vs May 2025-May 2026 | -37.8% | 11 EU joint-assessment states |
| Same windows, non-orphan medicines | May 2024-May 2025 vs May 2025-May 2026 | -46.1% | 11 EU joint-assessment states |
| United States control | May 2024-May 2025 vs May 2025-May 2026 | -10.5% | United States |
Mechanism
How a European Launch Became an American Pricing Decision
Most-favored-nation pricing runs in one direction: a US launch price is benchmarked to the lowest price a manufacturer charges in peer countries, so the first European price becomes a ceiling on what America can later be charged for the same molecule. Because the rules are still moving — an executive order in May 2025, then company-by-company agreements, then Medicaid-wide pricing in September 2026, and now a Medicare pilot in court — waiting has become rational. Europe has become the market that punishes a manufacturer for entering first.
- Rules in motion: the order, the individual agreements and the September 2026 Medicaid extension keep rewriting the benchmark, so a European price agreed today can become the ceiling for US Medicaid and Medicare tomorrow.
- All-or-nothing Europe: joint clinical assessment has applied to oncology and advanced therapy products since Jan. 12, 2025, and the 2028 EU package strips twelve months of market protection from any medicine not launched in every member state within three years, making a partial European launch unattractive even when one market is large.
- The count that proves the point: non-orphan launches fell 46.1% in the eleven affected states while orphan launches fell only 9.9%, which is the signature of a commercial sequencing decision rather than a regulatory slowdown.
- The exception that explains the rest: Novartis chief executive Vasant Narasimhan has said bypassing Europe's government payers for ianalumab, the first approved targeted treatment for Sjögren's disease, is not off the table, with significant delays from 2027.
| Launch cohort | First window | Second window | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| All new medicines | 527 | 328 | -37.8% |
| Non-orphan medicines | 406 | 219 | -46.1% |
| Orphan medicines | 121 | 109 | -9.9% |
| Orphan medicines outside joint-assessment scope | 73 | 72 | -1.4% |
Bypassing Europe's government payers is \"not off the table,\" with significant delays beginning in 2027.
The margin arithmetic
Europe Is About a Fifth of Sales for the Big Three, Which Is Why Deferral Is a Margin Story
Deferring a European launch does not shrink the revenue base — it relocates it, and it changes who sets the price. For the three European majors with the cleanest geographic disclosure, Europe supplies about a fifth of net sales, so the volume controlled by the launch calendar is smaller than the headlines imply, while the US share — where the protected price sits — has been growing faster. Sanofi shows the divergence best: European net sales of €9,169 million grew 1.6% at constant exchange rates in 2025 while US sales of €22,176 million grew 16.3%. Deferring Europe trades volume for control of the price that anchors US reimbursement.
| Company | European net sales | Europe share | US net sales | US share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis | $16,689M | 23.4% | $23,331M | 32.8% |
| AstraZeneca | $12,021M | 21.6% | $23,444M | 42.2% |
| Sanofi | €9,169M | 21.0% | €22,176M | 50.8% |
Trailing gross margin: who can absorb a wider US rebate
Trailing twelve months to Sept. 30, 2026, from each company's reported quarterly results. Insmed's margin reflects a small, concentrated revenue base rather than scale.
Unit: Trailing gross margin
Insmed
84.3%
Eli Lilly
83.6%
AstraZeneca
80.1%
Novartis
74.6%
Sanofi
73.7%
Company evidence
One Quarterly Filing Proves the Deferral Better Than Any Aggregate Count
Insmed is the cleanest case in public markets. Brensocatib won European approval in November 2025, yet the company's third-quarter filing still attributes all international Brinsupri revenue to expanded-access programmes in Europe — named-patient supply rather than a commercial launch. In the same quarter the company launched Brinsupri in Japan following Japan's approval in August, and in March 2026 it said it was holding ex-US launches until US pricing rules were clear. Europe approved the drug but never turned the approval into a commercial launch.
- ARIKAYCE, the legacy product, generated $124.4 million of the $524.4 million of Q3 2026 product revenue, leaving roughly $400 million of Brinsupri booked entirely in the United States.
- Nine-month product revenue of $1,255.9 million against $338.8 million from ARIKAYCE implies roughly $917 million of Brinsupri, with Europe still supplying only expanded-access volume.
- A trailing net loss of $605.6 million on $1,519.7 million of sales, and 17.0 times enterprise value to sales, leave the European launch decision as the dominant binary in the equity.
Supply chain
Upstream Capacity and Downstream Volume Both Follow the Calendar
Contract manufacturing is paid on the expectation that a product will be sold, not on the hope that it will be approved. WuXi Biologics operates the largest listed European biologics footprint, with Europe at 23.1% of revenue in 2024, and it is not yet showing: first-half 2026 revenue rose 18.4% to RMB 11.8 billion with adjusted net profit up 38.6% to RMB 3.9 billion, because work outside Europe more than covered European softness. WuXi's numbers show European deferrals are still a volume question rather than a revenue question.
| Layer | Company | Link to the launch calendar | Disclosed number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream — biologics manufacturing | WuXi Biologics | Europe-weighted sponsor volume deferred | Europe 23.1% of 2024 revenue; H1 2026 revenue RMB 11.8bn, +18.4% |
| Upstream — biologics manufacturing | Samsung Biologics | US onshoring absorbs capacity released in Europe | Q3 2026 revenue KRW 1,490bn, operating profit KRW 640bn |
| Upstream — clinical services | ICON plc | Commercial-phase work slips with the launch | FY2025 revenue $8,251m, up 0.8% |
| Downstream — distribution | McKesson | European new-brand volume shrinks | Trailing revenue $418.8bn; International covers 13 European nations |
| Downstream — distribution | Cencora | US specialty volume concentrates in the first-launch market | Fiscal 2026 revenue $337.4bn; gross margin 4.1% |
Distribution sits at the other end of the same calendar. McKesson runs an international segment that wholesales to hospitals, pharmacies and providers across 13 European nations and Canada, and Cencora splits its business between US Healthcare Solutions and International Healthcare Solutions. Neither can create a launch, but both are paid on the volume that crosses their warehouse doors. Deferring a launch moves the volume between countries without creating any.
Horizons
The First Wires Cross in 2027; the Permanent Damage Lands in 2028
- Near term: Pfizer chief executive Albert Bourla expects the pricing agreements to survive a Democratic-controlled Congress, because they were signed in exchange for tariff relief rather than for the length of one administration.
- Near term: PhRMA sued on Oct. 7, 2026 over the Medicare Part B pilot that benchmarks hospital drug prices internationally, and three industry groups are now pressing Congress to open a pricing probe.
- Near term: Q4 2026 results carry the first clean read on 2027 European launch schedules, which is where deferrals either convert into withdrawals or quietly reverse.
- Near term: Section 232 duties on patented drugs and ingredients reach the full 100% default rate for importers without a reduced-rate arrangement from Sept. 29, 2026, pulling manufacturing decisions toward the US and Asia.
- Over 1-3 years: the EU pharmaceutical package, due in 2028, removes twelve months of market protection from medicines not launched in every member state within three years, so a product deferred past 2028 loses more than a year of exclusivity.
- Over 1-3 years: joint clinical assessment extends to all orphan medicines in 2028, removing the exemption that has so far limited the decline to a 9.9% fall in orphan launches against 46.1% elsewhere.
- Over 1-3 years: Europe's answer is a repricing agenda rather than a volume agenda. The health commissioner called the position a critical point in April 2026 and Novartis has demanded a complete rethink of European pricing, so who moves first on price decides who keeps the launch.
| Date | Event | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Oct. 7, 2026 | PhRMA sues over the Medicare Part B pricing pilot | A ruling could reset the benchmark that anchors US pricing |
| Nov. 3, 2026 | US midterm elections | Sets the political durability of the pricing architecture |
| Nov. 9, 2026 | Congress opens a drug-pricing probe | Makes the benchmark a campaign issue rather than a pilot |
| Q4 2026 results | Launch-timing commentary | First read on 2027 European schedules and withdrawn filings |
| 2027 | Novartis ianalumab in Europe | Management has flagged significant delays beginning in 2027 |
| 2028 | EU pharmaceutical package implementation | Twelve months of protection lost without an all-country launch |
| 2028 | Joint clinical assessment for all orphan drugs | Removes the exemption that has muted the launch decline |
Synthesis
What the Evidence Supports, and What It Does Not
- Supported: European launch volume fell materially after May 2025, with four independent counts between 27% and 46.1%, while US launches fell 10.5% over the same matched windows. The direction is not in dispute.
- Supported: the mechanism is commercial sequencing rather than regulatory failure — Europe's regulator kept recommending new medicines, and one company's filing shows a European approval left unmonetised while Japan's was launched.
- Inference, not fact: the size of the 2027 revenue hole. No company discloses a European launch-consulting line, so the deferral remains an estimate built from launch counts and regional sales splits.
- Not supported: that the policy has raised US prices, or that US volume has absorbed Europe's. US launches fell too, only more slowly than Europe's.
- Speculation worth naming: if voluntary concessions are written into statute, the launch calendar becomes a permanent feature of European market access rather than a two-year dislocation.
The launch calendar, priced stock by stock
- European approval in November 2025 has produced only expanded-access revenue, with roughly $400 million of Q3 2026 Brinsupri sales booked in the US.
- A trailing net loss of $605.6 million on $1,519.7 million of sales leaves the European launch the dominant binary in the equity.
- Near term: a European commercial launch or a formal deferral at the Q4 2026 report; over 1-3 years, the 2028 EU package makes a partial European launch costly.
- Europe supplied $16,689 million of FY2025 net sales, 23.4% of the group, and the chief executive has floated bypassing European payers for ianalumab.
- Delaying Europe trades volume for control of the price that anchors US reimbursement.
- Near term: 2027 launch decisions on ianalumab; over 1-3 years, the 2028 EU package removes twelve months of protection without an all-country launch.
- European net sales of €9,169 million grew 1.6% at constant rates in 2025 against 16.3% in the US, so the launch calendar matters less than the mix.
- The chief financial officer says the group will keep launching in Europe, possibly at higher prices, choosing price over volume.
- Near term: evidence of higher European net prices in Q4 2026; over 1-3 years, German and French reimbursement reform decides whether Europe pays more.
- A trailing gross margin of 83.6% on $86.5 billion of sales and 38.6% quarterly revenue growth give it the most room to concede US price.
- A US-first launch pattern keeps the reference price inside its own market and makes European deferrals immaterial to the revenue line.
- Near term: FY2027 guidance assumes the pricing architecture holds; over 1-3 years, a statutory version of the agreements would make the advantage permanent.
- Europe supplied $12,021 million of FY2025 product sales, 21.6% of the total, while the US contributed $23,444 million, or 42.2%.
- Third-quarter 2026 revenue of $15,993 million grew 5.3%, so the launch calendar shows up in European sequencing rather than in the growth rate.
- Near term: any change in European filing or launch sequencing; over 1-3 years, the 2028 EU package forces a multi-country decision.
- Europe was 23.1% of revenue in 2024, the most Europe-weighted biologics manufacturing book among listed peers.
- First-half 2026 revenue rose 18.4% to RMB 11.8 billion with adjusted net profit up 38.6%, showing non-European work is offsetting European softness.
- Near term: US tariff exposure from the Sept. 29, 2026 default rate; over 1-3 years, European sponsor deferrals decide whether the European base holds.
- Third-quarter 2026 revenue of KRW 1,490 billion and operating profit of KRW 640 billion were driven by Plant 5 ramp-up and US manufacturing operations.
- Korea's 15% reduced tariff rate against the 100% default applied from Sept. 29, 2026 makes Asian supply the cheapest route into US demand.
- Near term: US facility commitments tied to pricing agreements; over 1-3 years, onshoring keeps biologics capacity out of Europe.
- The international segment wholesales into 13 European nations and Canada, so deferred European launches land where pricing power is weakest.
- Trailing revenue of $418.8 billion at a 3.7% gross margin makes European new-brand volume a mix question, not a thesis-breaker for a distributor this size.
- Near term: FY2027 specialty volume guidance captures the US-first shift; over 1-3 years, European distribution mix drifts lower as US specialty mix rises.
