Goldman Q2 2026 FICC
$4.59B
+32% YoY; intermediation $3.38B, financing $1.22B
Goldman Q2 2026 Equities
$7.42B
+72% YoY, all-time record
Goldman Q3 2026 FICC guidance
Slightly softer
vs Q2; Solomon, Barclays conference, Sept 16, 2026
Goldman Q3 expense guide
+$500M+
Q3 non-comp above Q2; accelerated tech investment cited
Fed funds target, Sept 16
3.75-4.00%
+25bp, unanimous, first hike since 2023
10-year Treasury yield
~5.00%
Highest since 2007; vs 4.05% one year ago
The setup
Solomon split the tape: FICC softer, equities still firing
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon took the Barclays24th Annual Global Financial Services Conference stage in New York on Sept 16 and gave investors the first Q3 window into the Wall Street trading desk that prints the others. His message landed in two pieces: FICC will be \"slightly softer in the third quarter\" versus the record-equivalent $4.59B Q2 print, and equities will be \"very strong.\" He framed the relative FICC softness inside a longer arc — \"FICC has been volatile\" this year, with Q2 +32% YoY following a Q1 -10% drop tied to the Iran-war rates dislocation.
FICC has been a little bit softer on a relative basis, but there's still a few weeks left in September. Equities have been very strong.
Solomon also made the disclosure that mattered more for the bottom line: Q3 non-compensation expenses will run more than $500 million above Q2, driven by elevated client activity and accelerated technology investment. On a Q2 operating-expense base of $8.71B, a $500M step-up is a 6% jump in the cost stack — a larger drag on Q3 EPS than the FICC softening itself, even assuming Equities keeps its Q2 record $7.42B momentum.
The buried warning
The $500M expense jump hits EPS harder than the FICC step-down
Q2 2026 non-comp expense base
$8.71B
GS10-Q, Q2 FY2026 (filed Aug 3, 2026)
Q3 guide vs Q2
+$500M+
Solomon, Barclays conference, Sept 16, 2026
Implied Q3 non-comp
≥$9.21B
Q2 base + $500M guide; tech investment cited
Diluted shares Q2
304.9M
Weighted average diluted, Q2 FY2026
Implied EPS drag
~$1.30
$500M pre-tax × (1-22%) ÷ 305M shares
Goldman just posted a record $20.98 of Q2 EPS — the cleanest beat in years, with FICC intermediation up sharply and Equities printing its largest-ever quarter at $7.42B. The Q3 setup is structurally different. FICC off a touch, expenses up a lot, and Equities now has to do even more of the heavy lifting. The market understood this on Sept 14, when Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan warned that Q3 IB fees would fall 10%+ YoY and trading would be flat versus Q3 2025's $5.4B: BAC stock dropped 5% and Goldman Sachs fell 4% the same session, on the read that the big Q2 trading numbers would not repeat.
Why now
FICC softens into a Fed hike and a collapsing-rate-vol regime
The macro backdrop is the worst combination for a fixed-income trading desk: a Fed that is hiking for the first time in three years, Treasury vol that has been deflating since the Iran shock, and corporate clients sitting on the sidelines while long-end yields hit levels not seen since 2007. The 10-year Treasury printed ~5.00% intraday on Sept 14, the highest since 2007, and the MOVE index sits near 83 — well below the spikes Goldman rode in Q1 and Q2, but not low enough to guarantee a quiet tape into year-end.
- Fed policy is the lead, not the lag: the FOMC voted unanimously on Sept 16 to lift the funds rate 25bp to 3.75-4.00%, the first hike since 2023; Chair Warsh said underlying inflation is \"not improving\" and the SEP implies one more 2026 hike plus another in 2027 before cuts resume.
- Bond issuance is at record levels and absorbed by the bid, not the street: US corporate bond issuance is up 29.8% YTD YoY through August per SIFMA, and IG issuance is +38% Y/Y per BofA Global Research — meaning more deals, but more of it bought-and-held, less of it traded.
- Treasury vol has compressed into the hike: MOVE at ~83 versus 30-day realized of 71 means option-implied vol is normalizing lower after the Q1 Iran spike — the asymmetry that powered Q2 FICC intermediation is fading.
- Hedge funds and asset managers are sidelined: ICI shows combined long-term fund and ETF flows turned to a slim $1.56B inflow for the week ended Sept 9, while fixed-income ETFs absorbed primary issuance rather than rotating inventory through dealers.
Solomon himself flagged the swing factor: the Q2 FICC surge came from intermediation in rates and credit, while Q1 had been hit by Iran-driven rates dislocation. With vol compressing into a Fed hike and a record-issuance calendar, the intermediary book — the part of FICC that monetizes client two-way flow — has the thinnest setup it has had all year. Financing revenues, which Goldman's Q1 commentary flagged as now ~40% of FICC, are more stable, but the intermediation line is the one at risk of a Q3 step-down.
The peer picture
Cross-bank Q3 setup: BofA flat, Goldman softer, JPM and Citi on the hook
| Bank | FICC Q2 2026 | FICC YoY | Equities Q2 2026 | Equities YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs (gs) | $4.59B | +32% | $7.42B | +72% |
| JPMorgan (jpm) | $6.05B | +6% | $6.0B | +86% |
| Bank of America (bac) | n/a (combined $7.2B S&T) | +33% combined | $3.6B record | +70% |
| Citigroup (c) | $4.7B | +7% | n/a | Equities +45% combined |
| Morgan Stanley (ms) | $2.46B | +13% | Mkt-leading | Mkt-leading |
JPMorgan carries the biggest absolute FICC book of the group at $6.05B in Q2, with fixed income up only 6% YoY versus Goldman's +32% — meaning Goldman now has more FICC YoY momentum to give back in Q3. Citigroup printed $4.7B (+7% YoY), with the gain concentrated in spread products rather than rates; that mix is less exposed to a vol collapse than a rates-led franchise like Goldman Sachs's. Morgan Stanley — at $2.46B in fixed income with Equities leading — has the lightest pure-FICC exposure of the five and is structurally the most insulated if rates vol stays compressed.
The infrastructure
Where the vol collapse leaves the trading pipes
FICC softness at the dealer level does not map one-for-one onto the electronic bond-trading infrastructure. August data tell the split story: Intercontinental Exchange reported August total ADV up 14% YoY with record open interest in interest-rate futures, and Tradeweb reported $2.8T August ADV, up 13.7% YoY. Volumes are still expanding even as dealer-intermediation economics weaken, because the activity is migrating to futures and all-to-all electronic protocols rather than voice-brokered cash bond flow.
- Futures over cash: CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange benefit when Treasury vol is durable and clients hedge — but if MOVE settles into the 70s, futures activity will slow too.
- All-to-all credit: MarketAxess and Tradeweb are absorbing the buy-side-to-buy-side flow that used to route through dealer balance sheets, insulating their take-rate revenues even as dealer FICC softens.
- Hedge-fund prime brokerage: if hedge funds de-risk further into the hike, prime financing revenue at the dealer level (40% of Goldman Sachs's FICC) holds up better than intermediation — a subtle silver lining for the franchises with the largest financing books.
What it means
Two-horizon view: the September noise and the Q3 EPS reset
In the near term — the next two to six weeks — the tape is what Solomon said it is: FICC softer, Equities strong, expenses a known drag, and the 4% selloff in Goldman Sachs on Sept 14 already priced in the warning. The harder question is over a one-to-three-year horizon: if the Fed delivers the additional2026 hike the SEP implies and2027 starts with rates above 4%, the FICC intermediation book is structurally smaller than 2025's record, while Equities and IB are more durable. That is a thesis the Street will re-rank after the Q3 prints in mid-October, and the larger question is whether the cost base keeps stepping up at the $500M pace Solomon just telegraphed.
Stocks to watch
- Q3 FICC guided 'slightly softer' versus the $4.59B Q2 base, a likely single-digit-percent step-down now baked into the Sept 14 4% selloff.
- Q3 non-comp expense guide of $500M+ above Q2 implies ~$1.30 of EPS drag — a larger Q3 EPS lever than the FICC shortfall itself.
- Q3 Equities flagged 'very strong' after a record $7.42B Q2 keeps the franchise's two-sided story intact; watch the mid-October print for confirmation.
- Largest absolute FICC book of the peer group at $6.05B in Q2, with the slowest YoY growth (+6%) — most absolute dollars to lose if rates vol stays compressed.
- Q3 results due in mid-October will be the first read on whether the $6B Equities franchise (+86% YoY) can offset FICC softness.
- Dimon has not pre-announced Q3 trading; an in-line guide from JPM would validate the peer-wide FICC softness thesis first articulated by Bank of America.
- Sept 14 warning already drove a 5% selloff: Q3 sales & trading guided flat YoY vs $5.4B in Q3 2025, with IB fees down 10%+ to $1.6-$1.8B.
- Record $3.6B Q2 Equities (+70% YoY) is unlikely to repeat at the same magnitude in Q3 if hedge-fund activity fades into the Fed hike.
- Cheapest FICC multiple among peers (BAC P/E ~13.8 vs Goldman Sachs ~15.1) makes the downside a value question as much as a fundamentals question.
- Lightest pure-FICC exposure of the five US franchises at $2.46B in Q2 (+13% YoY); Equities and Wealth Management are the larger revenue lines.
- Wealth Management revenue base is less rate-sensitive than the trading desks and helps offset any FICC step-down through2026.
- Has not pre-announced Q3 trading, leaving the Q3 mid-October print as the cleanest data point on whether peer FICC softness is structural.
- Q2 FICC $4.7B (+7% YoY) is concentrated in spread products rather than rates — a mix that is less exposed to a vol collapse than Goldman Sachs's rates-led book.
- Q2 Markets revenue +17% YoY with Equities +45% combined suggests the trading franchise has more two-sided momentum than peers.
- Stock trades at the cheapest multiple of the peer set (P/E ~14.7, P/B ~1.19); Q3 print due mid-October is a re-rating catalyst either way.
- August 2026 total ADV +14% YoY with record open interest in interest-rate futures shows the trading-infrastructure layer is decoupling from dealer FICC softness.
- Fixed Income and Data Services segment is the structural winner if buy-side flow migrates to all-to-all electronic protocols.
- Lowest beta in the peer set (~0.93) makes Intercontinental Exchange the defensive way to play bond-market activity without taking dealer-balance-sheet risk.
- Treasury futures volume is the barometer for whether the FICC softness at dealers is cyclical (compressed-vol pause) or structural (migration to all-to-all).
- Q3 average daily volume print in early October will determine if CME Group keeps the bullish infrastructure call or rolls over with the dealer desks.
- Stock trades at ~23x forward P/E and ~3.8x book — the most expensive way to play the bond vol normalization.
- Pure-play on electronic credit trading — the most direct exposure to a FICC intermediation slowdown at the dealer level.
- Q2 revenue was already flat YoY and EPS grew only 1%, signaling the franchise is at an inflection against softer dealer balance-sheet activity.
- Tape ADV data through Q3 will confirm whether buy-side-to-buy-side flow is absorbing the dealer softness or whether the credit tape is grinding lower.
