The directive
Make your own power
Truth Social post, Oct. 21, 2026
Legal force
No order, no formula
No executive order, directive or rule has been issued
Local opposition
70% of Americans
Gallup survey, March 2–18, 2026, published May 12, 2026
The directive
A Mandate Written in a Social Media Post
On the morning of Oct. 21 the president wrote that new and large data centers “are mandated by me to make their own electricity, and give or sell any excess back to the local community, or grid,” and that operators who want local goodwill should “pay the community, and/or individuals within the community, a ‘dividend.’” The instruction arrived without an executive order, a dollar figure or an enforcing agency.
| Date | Instrument | Legal force | What it changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb. 2026 | Presidential statement that major technology companies must build their own power plants | None | First signal that self-generation is expected of hyperscalers |
| Mar. 4, 2026 | Ratepayer Protection Pledge signed at the White House by Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle and xAI | Voluntary commitment | Signers agree to build, bring or buy new generation, cover the cost of power delivery upgrades, and pay for capacity “whether they use the electricity or not” |
| Sept. 16, 2026 | H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, passed the House 417–3 | Federal statute if enacted | Would require state utility regulators to write special rules so large loads meet the cost of new power |
| Sept. 17, 2026 | Senate blocked H.R. 9340 on a unanimous-consent request | Dead | No federal statute, so ratepayer protection stays with state commissions |
| Oct. 21, 2026 | Truth Social post declaring self-generation “mandated by me” and asking operators to pay communities a “dividend” | None — no order, no formula, no agency | Presidential cover for state and local cost-allocation deals |
- Four steps in eight months — February's recommendation, March's pledge, September's House vote and October's post — escalated recommendation into mandate without one enforceable rule.
- The trigger is arithmetic rather than policy: Gallup's March 2026 survey found 70% of Americans opposed a data center in their local area, 48% of them strongly, with only 27% in favour.
- What the post does do is move the argument from the utility regulator's docket to the president's podium, which is exactly what a state commission needs before it reallocates transmission costs.
Ratepayer protection
Virginia Is Writing the Rule Washington Cannot
The binding instrument is a July 31 order from the Virginia State Corporation Commission. It requires Dominion Energy to charge large loads directly for the substations and transmission lines built to connect them, through mandatory contributions in aid of construction, and it cut the typical residential customer's monthly increase from $2.90 to $0.94. The commission that actually sets retail prices has already forced data centers to pay directly for the grid that serves them.
Large-load rate class
25 MW or more
Virginia's GS-5 class for the biggest electricity customers, effective Jan. 1, 2027
Residential bill relief
$2.90 → $0.94 a month
Typical customer under the amended Rider T-1 allocation factor, order filed July 31, 2026
Base rate granted
$565.7M for 2026
Virginia SCC award against Dominion Energy's $822M request; $209.9M approved for 2027
Public opposition
61% of Americans
Annenberg Public Policy Center, up from 49% in the March 2026 survey
- Virginia's commission also created the GS-5 rate class for customers demanding 25 MW or more, effective Jan. 1, 2027, after rejecting Dominion Energy's requested $822 million and $345 million base-rate increases for 2026 and 2027 and granting $565.7 million and $209.9 million instead.
- The commission left the bigger question open: whether upstream transmission costs should also be assigned directly to large loads, and whether a blended approach should push them into the new GS-5 class. That docket is where the next repricing of hyperscaler power contracts gets fought.
- The federal route is closed for now. The House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act 417–3 on Sept. 16 and the Senate blocked it the next day, which left ratepayer protection in the hands of state commissions.
Supply chain
The Money Moves From Rate Base to Order Book
Self-generation shifts hyperscaler capital out of utility rate base and into equipment order books. That is not a forecast; it is already the order book. GE Vernova booked $24.2 billion of orders in the second quarter, up 88% organically, and its gas equipment backlog plus slot reservations rose from 100 GW to 116 GW.
| Company | Role in a self-built campus | Latest disclosed evidence |
|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova | Heavy-duty gas turbines and grid electrification | Q2 2026 orders of $24.2B, up 88% organically; gas backlog and slot reservations of 116 GW, at least 125 GW expected by year-end; Electrification data center orders above $5B year-to-date, more than double 2025 |
| Cummins | Gensets and behind-the-meter prime-power microgrids | Power Systems sales of $2.3B in Q2 2026, up 19%, with segment EBITDA of $552M at 24.5% of sales; full-year Power Systems growth guidance of 14–19% maintained |
| Doosan Enerbility | 380MW-class heavy-duty turbines | Seven units plus generators for one US data center, one a month from May 2029; 12 US turbines and 23 units contracted in total |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | JAC-series heavy-duty gas turbines | Record order backlog with 2029–2030 delivery slots tight; global turbine demand expected to exceed 100 GW in 2026 |
| Vertiv | Switchgear, uninterruptible power and distribution for self-built campuses | Q2 2026 net sales of $3.27B, up 24%, at a 22.6% adjusted operating margin; full-year sales guidance raised to $14B, up 37% |
| Constellation Energy | Merchant generation and long-term nuclear supply | 32,400 MW of capacity across five markets; ~920 MW of long-term nuclear power purchase agreements signed in Q2 2026 alone |
GE Vernova gas equipment backlog and slot reservations
Gigawatts of heavy-duty gas turbine capacity under contract or reserved, with the company's year-end 2026 target
Unit: GW
Q1 2026
Backlog plus slot reservations
100
Q2 2026
Backlog plus slot reservations
116
Year-end 2026 target
Company target
125
GE Vernova: what the price already assumes
Trailing revenue
$41.4B
TTM through Q2 2026
Trailing gross margin
20.2%
TTM through Q2 2026
Trailing free cash flow
$12.4B
TTM through Q2 2026
EV / trailing revenue
5.7x
At the current market price
EV / trailing EBITDA
26.1x
At the current market price
Net cash position
$9.2B
Market capitalisation $246.6B less enterprise value $237.4B
- The binding constraint is physical rather than legal. GE Vernova plans 20 GW of gas turbine output in Q3 2026, 24 GW in 2028 and 30 GW in 2030, so a campus ordered today realistically gets power in 2029. Doosan Enerbility ships its first US turbines from May 2029 for exactly the same reason.
- That is the point. The Oct. 21 post did not shorten a lead time; it locked in revenue for 2029–2030 delivery slots that were already full.
- Vertiv and the switchgear chain win on the same mechanism: a campus that builds its own power owns its own distribution, protection and backup, and buys more of it per megawatt than a campus that plugs into a utility.
- Constellation Energy is the counter-case. It sells the same electrons, but its growth case depends on hyperscalers continuing to buy grid-supplied power rather than building their own — which is precisely what the new directive pushes them toward.
The community dividend
The Dividend Prices Permission, Not Power
The dividend prices the licence to build, not the electricity. Scale it before pricing it: Memphis set the template, where the SpaceXAI Colossus agreement directs 25% of the site's tax revenue into communities within five miles and $3.3 million was collected in fiscal 2026. That is a rounding error against Alphabet's $132.4 billion of trailing capital spending.
- Because the payment is a share of the tax base rather than a fixed levy on power bills, it scales with the investment instead of with electricity use. The market's fear of an AI power bill cost shock is misplaced.
- What changes is tenure. A community collecting a permanent slice of the tax base becomes a long-dated claimant on the campus, which converts community opposition into a permanent local claim on site economics.
- The second clause is more consequential than the first. “Give or sell any excess back to the local community, or grid” turns a hyperscaler that over-builds into a market-based generator with its own interconnection, metering and reporting obligations, and it puts a floor under the price at which it must sell.
Legal limits
Washington Has No Legal Vehicle for What It Just Announced
A week before the post, FERC rejected PJM's attempt to make large loads bring their own capacity, writing that the proposal would “intrude on state jurisdiction over retail rates and appear to discriminate against large loads.” Retail rate design is state territory. That single sentence rules out the federal legal vehicle the president just announced.
- In the same week the Department of Energy gave PJM an emergency order spanning 13 states and Washington, D.C., letting the grid operator direct output and tap more than 35 GW of unused backup generation ahead of winter.
- PJM expects large-load interconnection requests to grow by roughly 70 GW by 2038 while 15 GW of generation has retired since 2022, and its 2028/2029 capacity auction cleared 6.8 GW short of its own reliability requirement. The grid is genuinely short of capacity, which confirms the administration is pushing the build onto the one buyer that can finance it quickly.
- Nothing in this stops the shift in capital. It means the shift runs through state commissions, interconnection queues and equipment lead times rather than through a federal rule, which is why the order books moved first.
Impact
Who Actually Wins and Loses the Shift
| Exposure | Mechanism | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Gas turbine and electrical equipment makers | Hyperscaler capital moves from power purchase premiums to turbine, genset and switchgear purchases | Positive |
| Merchant generators with contracted data center power purchase agreements | Contracted volumes hold, but incremental large-load demand migrates behind the meter | Mixed |
| Regulated utilities that built for data centers | Direct-assignment orders strip the ratepayer cross-subsidy out of the connecting infrastructure | Negative |
| Hyperscalers | Siting odds improve, but capital cost per megawatt and a permanent community claim both rise | Mixed |
The utility case is where the arithmetic turns against the incumbents. Dominion Energy ran $12.2 billion of capital expenditure over the trailing twelve months against $5.4 billion of operating cash flow, a $6.8 billion free cash outflow funded with $6.3 billion of new debt — and its regulator has now told it to collect the connecting transmission from data centers rather than from ratepayers. That shifts the value of a megawatt from the utility to the equipment maker.
- Constellation Energy shows the merchant-generator tension precisely: it contracted 3,590 MW to Alphabet's Google unit in October, including an 890 MW, 20-year nuclear agreement backed by more than $4.3 billion of its own investment, and its 32,400 MW of capacity sits in the same PJM and ERCOT markets where large loads are growing.
- Alphabet sits on the other side of the trade: trailing capital spending of $132.4 billion, up 45% from $91.4 billion in 2025, against $185.7 billion of operating cash flow. It gets cheaper political licence and dearer power, and the size of the spending pool makes the dividend affordable.
- The ratepayer side of the trade is already visible in one number: Virginia's commission cut the typical residential customer's monthly increase from $2.90 to $0.94, a 67.5% reduction, while ordering the data centers that caused the build-out to write the cheque.
Horizons
Elections Now, Turbines in 2029
- Next 90 days: the November midterms decide whether H.R. 9340 ever reaches the Senate floor. A flipped chamber would replace voluntary pledges and presidential posts with federal statute, which would be stricter than anything the White House has issued so far.
- Next two quarters: watch GE Vernova's third-quarter output against its 20 GW annualized gas turbine plan, and the first hyperscaler contracts written with explicit behind-the-meter ownership rather than a utility power purchase agreement.
- One to three years: the delivery cliff lands in 2029, when Doosan Enerbility's US turbines begin shipping and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's 2029–2030 slots open up. Revenue recognition for this entire theme arrives in 2029, not 2027, which means the next eight quarters are about orders, not earnings.
- One to three years: if host-community payment terms become standardized, as the presidential post implies, the dividend becomes a permanent cost line and a competitive variable between states, favouring operators that already hold agreements.
Put bluntly, the next two years are a story about who signs equipment contracts and the years after are a story about who owns the electrons. Investors who treat the Oct. 21 post as the moment the economics changed will be early by roughly two years — the mandate is a signal, and the order books are the confirmation.
Conclusion
Own the Order Books, Not the Power
The right reading of Oct. 21 is not that the president changed the law. It is that the administration conceded that the cost of AI power has become an electoral liability — 70% of Americans oppose local data centers, and opposition hardened from 49% to 61% between March and August — and chose to solve the politics by making hyperscalers pay for their own power and their own community goodwill.
Where the shift actually shows up in listed equities
- Gas equipment backlog plus slot reservations reached 116 GW in Q2 2026, with management targeting at least 125 GW by year-end 2026.
- Electrification data center orders passed $5B year-to-date, more than double the 2025 total, and Q2 orders rose 88% organically to $24.2B.
- turns a self-generation mandate into multi-year backlog rather than new demand, since 20 GW of Q3 2026 gas output caps near-term conversion
- Horizon: 2028–2030, when output steps to 24 GW and then 30 GW, is when the mandate shows up in cash flow.
- Power Systems sales rose 19% to $2.3B in Q2 2026, with segment EBITDA of $552M at 24.5% of sales against 22.8% a year earlier.
- captures microgrid demand that arrives years before grid turbines ship, with prime-power gensets filling the 2026–2030 gap
- Full-year guidance holds Power Systems revenue growth of 14–19%, and management targets more than $9B of data center exposure by 2030.
- Horizon: 2028–2030 is the delivery window, so genset revenue converts on a different clock than the turbine cycle.
- Q2 2026 net sales rose 24% to $3.27B at a 22.6% adjusted operating margin, up 410 basis points year over year.
- A self-built campus owns its switchgear, protection and backup, so it buys more electrical content per megawatt than a grid-connected one
- Full-year sales guidance was raised to $14B, up 37%, on a record backlog.
- Horizon: near term, backlog conversion drives revenue over the next two to three quarters rather than the headline.
- Seven 380MW gas turbines plus generators are contracted for a single US data center, delivered one a month from May 2029.
- Twelve US turbines are now under contract and 23 units are ordered in total, with the first 380MW unit shipped to the US in October 2026.
- turns a US-first mandate into a Korean share gain in a three-maker market
- Horizon: 2029–2030 is the delivery window, with no meaningful revenue before then.
- Gas turbine order backlog is at a record level, with 2029–2030 delivery slots described as tight.
- Global turbine demand is expected to exceed 100 GW in 2026, with strength seen continuing into 2027.
- captures the same behind-the-meter demand from a three-maker market where capacity, not price, sets the outcome
- Horizon: near term, order intake confirms the trend; revenue lands in 2029–2030.
- It contracted 3,590 MW to Alphabet's Google unit in October, including 890 MW of new nuclear backed by more than $4.3B of its own investment.
- Contracted volumes hold, but incremental large-load demand migrating behind the meter shrinks the premium merchant power captures
- Trailing free cash flow of $309M against $3.9B of capital spending and net debt near 3x EBITDA leaves little room for stranded assets.
- Horizon: watch capacity auction pricing; a weaker large-load signal is a 2027 story, not a 2026 one.
- Trailing capital expenditure of $12.2B against $5.4B of operating cash flow produced a $6.8B free cash outflow funded with $6.3B of new debt.
- Virginia's order requires direct assignment of connecting transmission to large loads, removing the ratepayer cross-subsidy its growth plan depended on
- Residential monthly impact was cut from $2.90 to $0.94, and the GS-5 class for 25 MW-plus customers takes effect Jan. 1, 2027.
- Horizon: near term, the 90-day filing deadline on the line extension policy is the first hard test; upstream transmission costs remain an open docket.
- Trailing capital spending of $132.4 billion, up 45% from $91.4 billion in 2025, against $185.7B of operating cash flow.
- Political licence improves siting odds, but self-generation raises capital cost per megawatt and adds a permanent community claim
- The 3,590 MW Constellation agreement signed in October shows the grid-supply model the directive pushes against for new campuses, and it will be grandfathered.
- Horizon: 2027–2029 is when new campuses are designed, so today's guidance barely changes.
